ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the impact of malnutrition diagnosed with Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria on the outcomes of patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma (PGIL).Methods:Patients with PGIL admitted into Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from January 2014 to July 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. Nutritional risk screening was conducted using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) scale, and malnutrition was diagnosed as per GLIM criteria. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis were performed to investigate the effect of malnutrition as per GLIM criteria on the outcomes of PGIL patients.Results:A total of 82 patients were included. The phenotypic parameters, including body mass index (BMI), arm circumference, leg circumference and grip strength, were at significantly lower levels in the 28 malnourished patients, compared with the other non-malnourished patients. The median overall survival of patients with malnutrition as per GLIM criteria was 10 months, while that of patients without malnutrition was 41 months, showing significant differences between groups. The univariate analysis revealed that age, loss of muscle mass, tumor stage based on Lugano classification and malnutrition as per GLIM criteria were the impacting factors for survival in patients with PGIL. The multivariate analysis further demonstrated that tumor stage based on Lugano classification and malnutrition as per GLIM criteria were the independent impacting factors for survival in patients with PGIL.Conclusion:Malnutrition based on GLIM criteria is an independent risk factor for unfavorable outcomes in patients with PGIL and could be utilized as a prognostic indicator.
ABSTRACT
Background The outcome of patients with primary extranodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PE-DLBCL) varies according to the primary site involved. Primary gastrointestinal, breast, bone, craniofacial, and testicular DLBCL are rare extranodal manifestations of DLBCL. Objective The objective of the study was to describe the clinical course of patients with PE-DLBCL disease in a referral cancer center. Results From 637 patients, 51 (8.77%) were considered as having PE-DLBCL (25 gastrointestinal, 12 craniofacial, 6 breast, 5 bone, and 3 with primary testicular DLBCL). Complete remission was higher in all PE-DLBCL sites (100% in testicular, 92.6% craniofacial, 83.3% breast, 80% bone, and 80% gastrointestinal) compared with 73.3% in nodal DLBCL. Although 2 cases with breast PE-DLBC relapsed, they achieved a complete response with chemotherapy. The overall survival at 5 years was 100%, 80%, 78%, 58%, 58%, and 62% for patients with primary breast, primary bone, gastrointestinal, primary craniofacial, primary testicular, and nodal DLBCL, respectively. Conclusions PE-DLBCLs constitute rare, primary sites of lymphoproliferative disorders in most cases, with localized disease and good prognosis. They require a combined chemoimmunotherapy with radiotherapy in most cases to improve local and systemic disease.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/pathology , Immunotherapy/methods , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Survival Rate , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Combined Modality TherapyABSTRACT
El tracto gastrointestinal es el sitio más frecuente de presentación del linfoma no Hodgkin (LNH) extraganglionar. Sin embargo, los linfomas primarios del tracto gastrointestinal son tumores raros y es mucho más frecuente la afectación de este tracto de manera secundaria en el curso de la enfermedad. Representan del 1% al 4% de los tumores malignos del tracto gastrointestinal, aunque tienen un curso, manejo y pronóstico muy diferente de los adenocarcinomas, por lo que es importante conocerlos y tenerlos en mente como un diagnóstico diferencial posible en el ejercicio clínico diario. Afectan más a los adultos jóvenes, con una mayor frecuencia en hombres (1). Reportamos el caso de una mujer de 47 años de edad con linfoma primario del intestino delgado, diagnosticado luego de múltiples consultas por síntomas abdominales y revisamos la literatura al respecto
The gastrointestinal tract is the most frequent site of non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NH) outside of the lymph nodes themselves. This tract is much more frequently compromised by tumors secondary to primary disease elsewhere in the body than by primary lymphomas of the gastrointestinal tract itself which are rare. They account for only one to four percent of malignant tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Their development and prognoses are quite different from those of adenocarcinomas, hence their management must differ as well. It is important to understand them and keep them in mind in differential diagnosis in daily clinical practice. Young adults are most frequently affected, and men are more frequently affected than are women. We review the literature and report the case of a 47 year old woman with primary small bowel lymphoma that was diagnosed after several consultations due to abdominal symptoms
Subject(s)
Lymphoma , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Intestine, Small , ReviewABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lymphomas are among the dominant solid tumors in children and primary gastrointestinal lymphomas (PGILs), although rare, are the most common extranodal lymphomas and the most common malignancies affecting the gastrointestinal tract in children. This study was undertaken to analyze childhood PGIL with reference to clinical presentation, anatomic distribution, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical (IHC) characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this 12 year combined retrospective and prospective descriptive study, all the cases of PGIL in children were selected according to Dawson’s criteria. RESULTS: A total of 11 cases were found which included 9 boys and 2 girls (male:female ‑ 4.5:1) ranging in age from 1 to 14 years (mean 6.6 years). Abdominal pain (81.8%) and intestinal obstruction (63.6%) were the most common presenting features. Grossly, most of the lesions were ulcero‑infiltrative (72.7%) and involved the terminal part of the ileum (36.4%) and ileocecal region (27.3%) most commonly. Histopathologically and IHC, all the cases were high‑grade lymphomas of diffuse large B‑cell type except for one case of mucosa‑associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. No case of Burkitt’s lymphoma was found. CONCLUSION: PGILs are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children worldwide with considerable variation in their clinicopathological features and treatment modalities. Only some studies are available in literature for comparison. Further studies are required to define the genetic and molecular basis of the different histopathological pattern found in our setting.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: There is still no consensus on the optimal treatment for primary gastrointestinal lymphoma (PGIL). The aim of this study was to compare surgery combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in PGIL. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the treatment outcomes of 107 patients with primary gastrointestinal lymphoma diagnosed between March 1999 and December 2009 at Kosin University Gospel Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: 35 patients who underwent surgery combined with chemotherapy (group A) and 72 patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone (group B). And we analyzed prognostic factors associated with short survival. RESULTS: The 5-year progression free survival rates (PFS) of group A and B were 86.7% and 66.1%, respectively (P = 0.037), while the 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were 86.8% and 68.4%, respectively (P = 0.129). In multivariate analysis, Both PFS and OS were not changed by treatment strategies (surgery combined with chemotherapy or chemotherapy only). The international prognostic index (IPI) was the only independent predictive factor for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, surgery combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy only make no difference of survival rate. And further randomized prospective studies are needed to confirm a treatment strategies at improving survival outcomes in PGIL patients.
Subject(s)
Humans , Consensus , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Therapy , Lymphoma , Multivariate Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the status quo of the diagnosis and treatments of primary gastro-intestinal lymphoma (PGIL) in order to improve it. Methods Eighty-one patients with PGIL were ana-lyzed retrospectively including clinical manifestations, endoscopic features, pathological features, HP in-fection, treatment, and prognosis. Results The age of patients with gastric lymphoma was (52.84±15.33) years. The age of patients with intestinal lymphoma was (42.09±15.28) years. Common symp-toms included abdominal pain (76.5%), gastrointestinal bleeding (55.6%), anemia (54.3%), abdominal mass (25.9%), hypoproteinemia (40.7%), bowel obstruction (11.1%), abdominal dis-tension, vomiting, and other non-specific gastrointestinal symptoms (32.1%), weight loss (33.3%); fever (8.6%), diarrhea (7.4%), digestive tract perforation (1.2%), constipation (1.2%), and dysphagia (1.2%). Endoscopic appearances were as follows: tumor type (67.7%), ulcer type (27.7%), and diffuse type (4.6%). Clinical diagnosis rate and endoscopic biopsy confirmation rate were 30.9% and 73.8%. MALT lymphoma accounted for 61.7% of the patients. HP detection rate was 39.5 % and positive rate was 37.5 %. A total of 69 patients received surgeries: 3 had preoperative chem-otherapy, and 34 had postoperative chemotherapy. Twelve patients had non-surgical treatment, 6 patients of whom had simple chemotherapy and HP eradication therapy, and the other 6 gave up during the treat-ment. There was no significant difference in the survival rate of Stage Ⅰ～Ⅱ patients in the surgery alone group, surgery plus chemotherapy group, and chemotherapy and HP eradication therapy group (P>0.05). The survival rate of Stage IIIⅢ～Ⅳ patients in the surgery alone group was lower than that in the other 2 groups (P<0.05). The 5-year, 3-year, and 1-year survival rate was 55.87%, 70.96%, and 96.39%, respectively. Conclusion There are no specific clinical and endoscopic features in PGIL, so the misdiagnosis rate is high. Multi-site biopsy or repeated biopsies and immunohistochemical methods can be used to raise the pathological diagnosis rate. Chemotherapy and HP eradication are recommended.
ABSTRACT
Nodular lymphoid hyperplasia is a reaction of the intestinal lymphatic tissue to specific inflammatory stimuli and may be probably of no clinical significance, but it may evolve to primary gastrointestinal lymphoma in more severe cases. Recently, several cases of nodular lymphoid hyperplasia complicated by primary gastrointestinal lymphoma have been reported, and which suggested that nodular lymphoid hyperplasia could not be considered as simple benign colon disease any more. We also experienced a case of primary jejunal malignant lymphoma associated with nodular lymphoid hyperplasia, and report this case with a brief review of relevant literatures.
Subject(s)
Colon , Hyperplasia , Lymphoid Tissue , LymphomaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary Gastrointestinal Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma (GIL) represents 4 to 20 % of all Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma(NHL) and gastrointestinal tract(GIT) is the most frequently involved extranodal site in NHL. It is known that the prognosis of GIL is better than that of other NHLs because of it's unique biologic behavior and anatomical location. We reviewed clinical aspects of GIL and analyzed survival data based on Ann-Arbor and Musshoff's staging system. METHODS: Sixty six cases were analyzed by age, sex, clinical manifestation, location, histology, clinical course, and two staging systems (Ann Arbor and Musshoff's modified staging). Histologies were reviewed according to REAL classification. RESULTS: The median age was 51.5 years. The most frequent gross finding was ulcerofungating lesion in upper GIL and mass lesion in lower GIL. Treatment results were as following : 76.9% of response rate, 59.5% of 5-year overall survival rate, and 54.8% of 5-year disease free survival rate. There was a significant difference of overall survival or disease free survival rate between group below stage IIE1 and above IIE2 according to Musshoff's staging system. There were no significant differences in survival between stage I and II, and between stage III and IV based on Ann Arbor staging system. CONCLUSION: There might be the necessity of discriminating localized disease (IIE1) and locally advanced lesion (IIE2) to predict the prognosis of GIL through Musshoff's staging system. Larger study will be needed to confirm the role of Musshoff's staging system.
Subject(s)
Classification , Disease-Free Survival , Hodgkin Disease , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Primary lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract is an unusual disease for which the optimal management strategy has not been clearly defined. The role of surgery in the management of primary gastrointestinal lymphoma remains controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the management and the outcome of 55 patients a diagnosis of gastrointestinal lymphoma who were treated at Kyung-Hee University Medical Center during the period 1986-1997. Thirty-seven of them underwent a resection for cure, and 23 patients of them underwent chemotherapy. 18 patients underwent chemotherapy only. Radiation therapy was excluded due to the small number of patients. Surgery consisted of wide local resection of the primary tumor (curative for stages I and II, and palliative for stages III and IV), and regional lymph nodes, with re-establishment of bowel continuity. Chemotherapy involved 6-10 courses of CHOP-B (cyclophosphamide, adriamicin, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin). Survival curves were calculated by using the Kaplan and Meier method. RESULTS: The mean age was 51 years (range: 3-82), the peak incidence of age was the fifth decades (34%), and the male-to-female ratio was 1.3:1. Common signs and symptoms at presentation were abdo minal pain (n=46), palpable mass (n=28), nausea/vomiting (n=26), and weight loss (n=18). The diagnostic sensitivities of ultrasound, contrast radiography, endoscopic biopsy, and computed tomography were 52%, 57%, 76%, and 78%, respectively. The primary tumor sites were the stomach (n=18), the terminal ileum & cecum (n=15), the small bowel (n=13), and the large bowel (n=9). The respective cumulative overall 5-year survival rates for stage I, II, III tumors were 89%, 74%, and 43% (p<0.05). The respective overall 5-year survival rate for resection only, resection with chemotherapy, and chemotherapy only were 100%, 78%, and 40% (p<0.05). By the Kaplan-Meier method, the prognostic factors of survival were stage and curative resection (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: A curative resection in a stage I, II lymphoma confined to the gastrointestinal tract and to regional involvement may improve patient survival.